Skip to main content

What is missing for a circular transition in the built environment? MIT study investigates

A construction site
News
North America

What is missing for a circular transition in the built environment? MIT study investigates

The construction sector's shift from a 'take-make-dispose' model to a circular 'make-use-reuse' approach aims to reduce waste. MIT-led innovations, stakeholder support, and policy incentives are driving adoption.
Luca Papapietro

The construction sector generates vast waste, with over 2 billion tons annually in China alone, highlighting the need for a circular economy. Unlike the 'take-make-dispose' model, circularity's 'make-use-reuse' approach reduces waste and environmental impact

An MIT study explored stakeholder perspectives on circular adoption, revealing barriers like cost, logistics, and regulatory challenges. 

Developers showed a willingness to pay higher costs for carbon reductions, while policy incentives could accelerate adoption. Innovations like MIT’s Pixelframe, a modular concrete system, demonstrate technical feasibility. 

Support from entities like MassCEC and the Biden administration further advances circularity, emphasising the reuse of materials like steel for sustainable construction.

CK Taylor
Original source:
Themes
Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
Financial support for energy efficiency in buildings, research and innovation
Construction materials and circular construction